![]() It’s not that the carbon dating is flawed, it’s that the conclusions are false, and this Journal says so. ^ already shows you are discounting it because you think the whole thing is lunacy. Or how would you account for the simple fact that if you were to say, drape a cloth over your face and trace the image on it, the resulting image wouldn't even be of a recognizable face but rather resemble something like a stretched blob? And let's not get into the sci-fi theories of radiation emitted from Jesus' body during resurrection and whatnot, because. How would you account for the fact that it pretty much just showed up out of nowhere in a village in France in the 14th century with no clear chain of custody, and the people who observed it at the time, most notably the bishop who had jurisdiction over that village, denounced it as a forgery and even wrote that his predecessor had identified the artist that made the shroud? However, for the sake of argument, let's say the carbon dating was wrong. I'm doubtful that the carbon datings done on the shroud are flawed, mostly for the reason that it seems most proponents of this theory are the most ardent defenders of the shroud (i.e., they really want it to be real) and not some neutral third parties. We know now that the 3 carbon datings all brought back meaningfully different datings, as well, we know now that the dating was done on a repaired part of the Shroud. A statistical analysis of the Nature article and the raw data strongly suggests that homogeneity is lacking in the data and that the procedure should be reconsidered." In 2017, in response to a legal request, all raw data kept by the British Museum were made accessible. However, the raw data were never released by the institutions. The results, which were centralized by the British Museum and published in Nature in 1989, provided ‘conclusive evidence’ of the medieval origin of the artefact. "In 1988, three laboratories performed a radiocarbon analysis of the Turin Shroud. 'retracted' is the wrong term, but the conclusions of the study dating to the Middle Ages has been shown to be flawed and not reliable, now that we have the full data of the carbon dating studies Repeat offenders will be banned, not permanently, we believe in finite punishment for finite transgression.Any denial/belittlement about the sex abuse scandal is not allowed.Official Coming-Out Advice Thread! Please look here before you post! Secular Student Alliance: To Organize, Unite, Educate, and Serve How to Formally Defect From the Catholic Churchĭeliver Us From Evil: A Documentary About Sex Abuse in the Catholic Church Please refrain from proselytizing to members of this community.Ītheist's Tool Box - How I left the Catholic Church Note: This subreddit is a support forum and not a debate group and will be moderated accordingly. ![]() No matter what your belief now, or if you have no belief at all. This subreddit is for any and all ex-Catholics to talk, educate, discuss and maybe even bitch about their experiences within the Catholic Church. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |